h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

media.htm            KEY  Page Changes 26 Mar. 2007

The MEDIA Page *page created February 1997* LINK TO MOST IMPORTANT REVELATIONS

Page DEDICATED hrbnrsml.gif 
	(1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities  lbduk.org (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads UK.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to,   assured in law.

IMPORTANT Notification & Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.

2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. They fail to publish that which they speak of, only in private; they assert and allege that the police simply fail to act in the criminal activities the 'poor victims' report to the police, and the 'poor victims even interfere in the work of others who are publishing and stating the facts and the evidence in support of their complaints, as victims of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts / legal system'. [*Link].


KEY To Page & Site
Page DEDICATION (*Link)
NEWS ARTICLES - List
IMAGES reproduced - List
LETTERS TO - List
LETTERS FROM - List
1. Page PERSONS - List
2. VENUES & Events - List
3. Page ISSUES - List
4. Page CHANGES - List
5. Confidential FRAUDS-Page
6. Courts  FORGERIES - Page
7. Council  FORGERIES -Page
8. Police Use Forgeries -Page
9. <>

Letters to  PRESS - List
1. The Times - Jan. 1996
2. Evening Standard<>

ARTICLES by  - List
1. Paul Foot - 4th April 1993
2. Lord Paul - March 2000
3. part 3
4. Home Office PR Apr. 2002
5. part 5
6. part 6
7. Home Secretary May 2003
8. part 8
<>

Site NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES

6.The Times-Plato Not Prozac
7. <>

IMAGES
PAGE - List
1. Sunday Express - 1993
2. Letter to The Times 1996
3. The Guardian(joke?) 1999
3. Daily Mail - Lord Paul 2000
4. Daily Express Aug. 2003
SITE - List
1. Judge ARRESTED - corrupt
2. Police LIES PROMOTED !
3. Police LIES FOLLOWED Up
4. Police LIES EXPOSED
5. Corrupt:Judges-Police-Min.
6. Victim(!) Covers Up CRIMES 7. CRIMES Reported to Gov.
8. Court IGNORES FORGERY
9. Victim(?) - Actors In Court
10. Media Part Of The Scams
11. Council Attempts FRAUD
12. APPEALING Court FRAUD
13. Court IGNORES FRAUD  14. Soc.Sec. IGNORE FRAUD
15 Barristers conduct survey
16. part <>

Letters TO   - List
1. Editor of The Times - 1996
2. Lord Chancellor Aug. 1998
3. Home Secretary 12 / 1998
4. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
5. Prime Minister - 12 / 1999
6. Frank Field MP - 4 / 2003
7. Haringey Council CROOKS
8. Fraudsters Club Recruit 01
9. Lap-dog -  LIPS Fraudster
10. Prime Minister - 2 / 2002
11. The Treasury - 2 / 2002
12. Home Secretary- 2 / 2002
13. Hackney Council CROOKS
14. Editor LEStandard 2/2002
15. ECoHR August 2003
16. <>

In the NEWS   - List
1. Prime Minister -  1 / 2002
2. Home Secretary - 4 / 2002
3. Sir Paul Condon - QPM
4. J Stephens Dep. Com 1998
5. Sir John Stevens - QPM
6. Home Secretary - 5 / 2003
7. <>

Letters FROM   - List
1. Gov. Opposition - 1995
2. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
3. <>

Page ISSUES - List
1.' NO FREE PRESS', a fact
2. 'MEDIA Conspiracy'
3. Journalists LIE / PERVERT
4. Press SUPPRESS Facts  
5.
Ignorant of the Law ?
6. Page THREE Experts
7. Combating Misinformation 
8. Community On Line
9. Mockery of Democracy
10. Media DO NOT CARE
11. SOME Half-truths - List
12. Journalist GAGGED Fact
13. DUTIES OF A JUDGE Law
13. The Bilderberg Group
13. <>

Page CHANGES - List
1. Links to Your Rights Page
2. Added Letter to Times 96
3. Link to Violation Art 2 FP
4. Links to Press LIES
5. Added Combat Guidelines
6. Democracy Our Definition
7. Lord Paul -Family Concerns
8. Link D.Telegraph & FRAUD
9.

Page PERSONS - List
1. John Swainton - USA
2. Rodney Aitkinson - UK
3. The Bilderberg Group
4. Promoters Of Crimes
5. Paul Johnson - UK
6. Lord Paul - Labour Peer
7. Francis Beckett- -  reporter
8. Paul Foot - <>
8. <>
8. <>

Page VENUES - List
1. Honest Retirement Speech
2. Daily Mail Article - 1997
3. <>


The Times on 12 June 1996 The press fully aware of the dictatorial rulings by the non elected. Judges in an alleged Democracy IMPOSING their arrogant and contemptuous of the rights of the citizens to DETERMINE through their representatives policy and cost effective government with security of mind and rights to who qualifies and who should benefit through tax impositions.
tlrjclr.jpg (199122 bytes)
The above in 1996. In 1997 we were raising issue about the Institutionally Organised rampant fraud in the handling of the Housing Benefit funds, through the Local Authorities and the local County Courts. In 1998 the Government acted after our submissions to the Home Secretary. In 2002 we acted again ( *Link). In April 2003 our submissions to Frank Field MP to the point   We pointed to the duties of elected Ministers leading to an explicit response by the Home Secretary (*Link). 

The letter from an Old Age Pensioner suffices. Sheer   positive discrimination.
penltrf.jpg (64489 bytes)

Our concerns have always been very simple. The judges are retained to administer the law that elected Members of Parliament enact. Their prime function is to apply the facts proven and established at court and to apply the relevant law. They are not retained as servants of the public and the law in order to ignore the evidence or to act in contempt of the law as they do as absolute Lords in contempt of everything and everybody.


Daily Mail 1 March 1994
dmgumacf.jpg (47706 bytes)

The cartoon above on the occasion when the Conservative MP, John Gummer adopted the Roman Catholic 'faith' after the Synod of the Church of England voted 'to field women priests'.

The cartoon below was transmitted to Messrs James Todd of VOMIT repute, Mr. Paul Talbot- Jenkins & Mr. Maurice Kellett. All 3, recognised subliminal indoctrination  operatives, pumping away their views on the powers that be, while serving other undeclared interests. All three kept on spreading the gospel  for the powers that be.

Image of the cartoon, as submitted to the editor of the 'Daily Mail'.

macdmsra.jpg (179048 bytes)

The editor was asked IF he would publish the modified version with the essential changes at the time. The editor simply stuck his head in the sand as expected of him One need only consider the words of J Swainton, accessed from here [*L]. The changes more clear than subliminal & to the point as to the forces at work for centuries.

 

They DO NOT CARE - the proof is in the text
The editor of 'The Times' did not consider the facts and realities stated in the letter below, suitable information for its readers. The realities pointed to, did not / do not conform to the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy. As such the submitted facts were not eligible for publication. The editor's reasons should be clear to any caring parent who recognises the implications the letter conveys, and especially so, if such experiences are not alien to them.
ltt96asr.jpg (60198 bytes)
The fact is,  that children are influenced at such young age, by the ill advised, who interfere in family and the rights of responsible parents. The policies were and remain unjustified violations of human-rights because they breach Article 2 of the First Protocol of the European Convention On human Rights [*Link].

The response below CLEAR
tnpja96r.jpg (19158 bytes)
Anyone dreaming of the media lapdogs who serve their masters ever informing the 'serfs' of the plans of their string pullers need not  plans of the x

  

NOT interested, nor concerned obviously. The media Intellectual Prostitutes serve other agendas, as intended for the sons of men. (The arrangements too clear and ignored by the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to be presented to 'humans' : thinkers). Their priorities simply to promote pre-determined scenarios & scripts in order to mislead, to indoctrinate and subjugate the naive and gullible to the plans of the criminals who have been in control for far too long, millennia. (*Link from here to a page where some truths and historical events are stated in proper context). 

But there exist plenty of other acceptable ideas.
drtat96f.jpg (71295 bytes)

The Headline below says it all. Can anyone point us to any representations made at the time by ANY OF THE ALLEGEDLY concerned leaders of any family oriented group of organised victims of the Divorce Industry and the SS (Social Services) in our allegedly civilised society that is subject to the whims of alleged servants of the public?
dmtbpsfr.jpg (136161 bytes)
Declared the Prime Minister. We look forward to actions, by New Labour, Government, establishing the proclamation as genuine from concerned members of his party and any other political forces in our allegedly civilised democracy.


Read below of the concerns and realities that no one has ever bothered to take on board. Simply consider the letter to the editor of 'The Times', above, four years earlier, covering arrogant and blunt interference in the family by persons who operate within our schools. Education Authorities  imposing blindly ill-conceived policies and creating the society that Lord Paul was/is concerned about. (Mar 2000)
dmlpflfr.jpg (334325 bytes)
access from here the article text reproduced on the right.

29 months late, 18th.  August 2003.UK serfs benefited from a gem of an article by Francis Beckett, disseminated by the Daily Express
de18augr.jpg (162623 bytes)
x

For details of the importance of this 'dust in your eyes suckers', article below,  read the disclosures below it and then  *Link to the clarification in another page at this site.
gsmgspfr.jpg (157881 bytes)
The fact that many an actor, a charlatan,  a stooge and  sold souls take targeted victims for a ride in and through the courts may be too much to swallow. That was precisely what took place in the instance covered / benefiting from the above type of publicity from the condescending media barons. It was followed by promotion of the group of the charlatans who engaged in theatrics just like the legal circles do (*Link).Particulars in due course OR, when requested, by the authorities. OPENLY stating facts now,  that it appears the promise in 1995 is to be attended to by the government. In the meantime charlatans who were / are members of the LIPS crowd / mob set about to embarrass and offend us by abusing a copy of the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to Andrew. Blunt abuse of  trust and arrogant breach of the terms under which the copy of the letter was issued to Mr Norman Scarth, other abusers of Andrew's time and generous nature, simply entertained in their petty and childish ways. TUTORED & GUIDED CRIMINALS following the ways and teachings from antiquity, as published in an allegedly holy book, that has been in existence for over 2300 years. [*Link to site].  

  

Copy of the letter below qualifies the arrangements between the legal circles and 'victims' who, on the one hand assert many a vile activity by the legal circles, while on the other hand they were / are engaging in the very activities themselves. The new recruits to the fraudsters club targeting other victims for introduction to solicitors they already created special bonds with, just like the one who got away (the protected by the like minded) care of the  suppressed evidence that was prepared by one who was actually following in the foot-steps of the one he had prepared the file of evidence against. Such persons simply carrying on as if all they indulge in, is within the law.
ajhrlfsr.jpg (46102 bytes)
Is it a case of simply as the new protected and used for more double frauds on the state are assured freedoms to indulge in?. Read the letter and recognise the implication. Indirectly informing the solicitor who acted wrongly: "We do not need your offer. Our client is to be rewarded for doing things our way. He is to benefit from public funds, the taxpayers are are going to foot the bill, as usual". FEAST your eyes on  such realities Sir John Stephens QPM. Justify, if you can  the convenient DEFAULTS TO PROSECUTE SUCH BLUNT FRAUDSTERS. They indulge & who milk state funds as they please. Such arrogant arrangements, between the criminals we point to, and  the police simply protecting them as they have been doing for centuries. We have known of the protection racket for well over 31 years now and the evidence is published in our pages.

  

Evening Standard & the usual Positive Discrimination. Our FAX to the editor merited from the usual contempt for the realities and the blunt RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, otherwise sold to the naive and gullible as political correctness; they luck the guts or the decency to call it IMPOSED STATES AS PLANNED AND INTENDED by the criminals behind it all.
les2003f.jpg (108800 bytes) Read the text of the image in the right panel & FIND OUT what the media have been ignoring & suppressing wilfully from their readers. For decades they have all been promoting the political correctness waffle we wrote of to the editor of 'The Times'.

d99ltpmr.jpg (140631 bytes)

The  HALF TRUTHS - List
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10

 

Access from here, and join Andrew Yiannides at: urrights.ning.com if as a victim you wish to challenge, EXPOSE abusers of trust & public office or public facilities

 

Facebookers can connect with the creator of this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders

 

undercon.gif (1065 bytes)

Page Revised: June 20, 2012 : Latest news on DIVORCE INDUSTRY, OFFICIAL statistics & an important link on use of media

Site reconstruction,ongoing improvements, addition of new pages and links to and from pages / other web-sites.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS MADE US ACCESSORIES if we kept quiet, LIKE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS WHO WORK TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEMES  by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before her.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes. We refer and point you to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover, thrive. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

This page is dedicated to the late Paul Foot, the only honest and genuinely concerned journalist we have had the pleasure to know. For years we admired his work and above all his sincerity and integrity. Sadly no longer with us after a life dedicated to serving his fellow humans conscientiously and with vigour. ((*Link to an article that should put to shame many a journalist and editor who never had the decency to admit and acknowledge that which Mr Paul Foot clarifies in the article. Mr John Swainton [*Link] spoke of the very malaise afflicting the silent dummies, when he was moving out of the firing line,however. Mr Foot, you will note, went one better, because he was not prepared to abandon his principles, something that even some of the victims (of institutionally organised fraud and corruption) we have met over the years, most certainly lacked; presumably they never possessed such attributes, as 'humans', in the first place. *Link to pages where we deal with and challenge SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES and the convenient defaults by such dreamers as they prove to have been:/ be (1) Johan Michael Richard Foenander, (2) Norman Scarth, (3) Veronica Beryl Foden, (4) Paul Talbot-Jenkins, (5) Barry Worral, (6) Ormila Bhoopaul, (7) G. Ebert,  and others we will be stating facts and releasing material about)).

The PRESS / MEDIA & THEIR CONTRIBUTION - Link from here to a QUOTE from a challenge to the papers

" The media play their part, quietly, by keeping facts from the public they are meant to inform without bias and or through tainted if not through the blinkered personal views of the editors and the media barons themselves. Undeclared policies of faceless quangos the media silently support and promote; presumably because it is in the public interest for the public to be kept in the dark. So long as selected groups benefit, at the expense of the public at large, the public must not be informed, for it knows not how to protect itself through the ballot box in the monocracy of the lowest of the low, supported and or used by the higher in same manner acting". [Links to: A conspiracy & AN admittance & a link to the cornerstone and foundations a new web-site].

More often than not the letters editors of the media, are seen to be acting as censors. They wilfully suppress facts, events and realities referred to them. They act as front line commanders for the creeping dictatorship in our country, and the rest of planet earth, which states the founder of human-rights recognised decades ago.With intent they ignore the rights of citizens who dissent from that which the politicians, and the editors, agreed to create for and serve to 'the serfs', without disclosing their parts in secret and undisclosed sessions of which Christ was recorded to have spoken, as reported by the editors of the New Testament almost 1700 years ago. [*Link from here to the extract from the gospel according to St Luke] As masters 'of the serfs' they treat the citizens and taxpayers with contempt, especially anyone who dissents from that which the editors set out to impose through tactical, subtle indoctrination of 'the ill-informed sons of men'. Such states through misinformation, deliberate disinformation and reckless suppression of the realities. [*Link from here to a challenge covering / pointing to HISTORICAL FACTS WILFULLY SUPPRESSED, by the criminals who seek total control of planet earth. *Link also from here to the page where we publish evidence and point to the root of their plans for the sons of men on planet earth. Persons who ARE INTERESTED as to how Intellectual Prostitutes misinform the public as John Swainton, an ex Chief of Staff at 'The New York Times' spoke in the course of his retirement speech, *access from here the article we point to and recognise why and who behind the promotion of lies and waffle. Read the rest of the material in this page and recognise WHY THE ORGANISERS OF THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP -of which Mr Andrew Yiannides first spoke and wrote in the mid-1970's- DO NOT WISH TO BE RAISED WITH OR POINTED TO THEIR LAP-DOGS / the sold -to the devil- souls who have been serving & working for their Masters' plans for mankind, for centuries, as covered and pointed to in our pages].

We have plenty of examples and a typical issue was that of the suggestions by the Education Department, in 1996, 'to contrive and introduce 'a moral code' owing to the fact that religious education and 'influence in the upbringing of children had declined to non existent teachings, allegedly because the parents themselves fail in that area'. We publish copy of a letter which the founder of human-rights -Mr Andrew Yiannides- was caused to send to the letters editor of 'The Times' at the time and the circumstances when 'The Times' was promoting  waffle while ignoring the realities pointed to in the letter all visitors and concerned parents should access and read. [*Link from here to the letter and recognise the realities & facts stated, relate to the attempts & how the SCHOOLS ARE USED, by the Education Authorities, in a typical set-up of a pseudo-democracy]. The content and the circumstances under which Andrew, as a parent, had been caused to act are as clear as can be. The censor -letters editor, a typical Intellectual Prostitute- at 'The Times' as an illiterate in / or contemptnor of the law (and dictator of policy by default) acted his role as a participant to the planning (in secret venues) of and for the implementation of the dictatorship many are waking up to as of the developments following the creation of the European Economic Community. The simply suppressed the facts stated, by failing to publish the letter and thus he wilfully obstructed the facts from being aired in an allegedly civilised democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.

In our alleged democracy through pre-determined scenarios the 'subjugation of the serfs', thrives. Such policies have long been established and it was all planned in secret, centuries ago and re-endorsed in modern times in the middle of the 20th century, covered below. By their very nature, the 'conspiratorial sessions' endorsed by and with such others the editors have been associating with for decades. All in favour of the creation of pseudo-democracies when-ever / where-ever the opportunity arose or could be created by the very interfering 'institutions'. Read below [*L] of the gratitude expressed by a leading person, a non-elected self-appointed 'ruler of the serfs' (one of many self-appointed rulers) and do not fail to access the disputed plans attributed to the very circles -and the followers- of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything' as presented to mankind some 2300 years ago, by the fraudsters who concocted their evil creation.

Read the letter [*Link from here to it] we publish in this page, and recognise HOW the state breaches and violates human rights through its institutions, beginning with 'state education centres' where the lessons and guidelines from the vilest book that ever was created are the foundation stone; upon such teachings the modern moral code is implemented by the dark powers that have been in control of it all for far too long. [*Link from here to the extract a young boy recognised as the most vile of activities, attributed to the 'deity' (the God) created by the creators of the Old Testament in the latter part of the 3rd Century Before the Common Era - in earlier years recorded / referred to as Before Christ]

THE FACTS: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades". The words of David Rockefeller who expressed 'his gratitude' as above were published in the French journal "Minute" in June 1991 [*Link from here to the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors / creators of the New Testament. *Link also from here to an extract from 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion', published in Russia in 1902]

The above extract is from Rodney Aitkinson's (British political economist) work 'Europe's Full Circle'.  One of the reviews on the well researched work, suffices: "The author has done a superb job in seeking to alert literate people to the colossal and dangerous impudence of corporate power which has already emasculated elected national legislatures". Fourth World Review.

Read, below, the words of a media insider, dating back to the 1870's. [*Link from here to the insider's explicit acknowledgement of the realities. *Link also from here to exchanges with another insider, with 25 years experience in the USA, with the founder of human-rights when addressing the issue of suppressed historical truths and ongoing corruption of societies through the media]        

We propose to publish comments on issues raised with the papers in the United Kingdom. Fair comment will be made in respect of issues raised by members on the Register of TAP = The Alternative Press. Its members WILL publish ALL and ANY documented evidence our Law Enforcement Agencies chose to ignore and have been ignoring for years.  Subjudice my Lords?  Some Court somewhere in the land of the free for all is meant to have dealt with the issues we SHALL PUBLISH. The rest of the population in the United Kingdom can then decide if such persons were/are fit to run .... pardon ruin the lives of others... merely because they benefit from some self-appointed right to act independent of Parliament's laws*. The laws the rest of society in the United Kingdom is meant to strictly adhere to. Media barons and editors conveniently forget that, "Ignorance Of 'The Law' Is No Defence", so our judges remind us. Those who know of The LAW*, and were appointed to judicial office because of their knowledge of law, and choose to act INJUDICIOUSLY have none; no defence at all [*Link from here to duties of any judge].

WE NEED ONLY INFORM AND REMIND THE AUTHORITIES that CRIME IS NOT STATUTE BARRED IN ANY CIVILISED COUNTRY. WE ARE told that we are a civilised society and the mother of modern Democracy. That WE ARE leading the world in that area.  WE HAVE SUCH LAWS ON OUR STATUTE BOOKS as to protect one and all from any wrong and defamatory statement that is not founded on FACT, TRUTH and or documented EVIDENCE. The LAW* supports our cause and guarantees OUR RIGHTS IN LAW*

The evidence members of TAP are / will be publishing through these pages, suffice. Let the world at large be the jury.

OVER TO YOU, YOUR LORDSHIPS, your HONOURS AND our page three experts. The experts who promote and use EVES as in the Old Testament qualified and clarified. We point to that fact that the Old Testament is common to ALL THREE basic religions the vast majority of the population in the United Kingdom, was born into. It is immaterial if they follow their predecessors' orientations and MORALS* as opposed to the secularism instilled in the citizens through the media and 'the self appointed knowledge classes', as Frank Schaeffer refers to 'specialists' who think they know best, in his work, "Dancing Alone".

The knowledge classes, like our judges, doing their best to create a society of lawlessness and free individuals who are encouraged TO INDULGE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MAJORITY, just as the legal/judicial/police/Mafia were/have been allowed to lead us into for..... HOW LONG?

NOTE our challenge to the editor of the Daily Mail. On the very day Paul Johnson was declaring "Corrupt Britain"* and the editor was proclaiming: "Time For Ministers To Tell The Truth... in the editorial column. OUR CHALLENGE, clear. HOW ABOUT THE EDITORS making sure that the public is TOLD the truth and given the chance to make up its mind? 
"Treat not the public as morons, please,
because THE INTERNET IS HERE TO STAY; to protect the citizens from the licensed criminals who have been feasting upon the 'serfs' for centuries. They have been doing so, because the MEDIA, the so called guardians of society, are run by sold souls who serve the abusers of office, the corrupters, the corrupt, and the corrupted". [*Access below: Chief of Staff confirms the rampant Press LIES. *Access also the letter challenging an editor to come clean OR go learn and investigate TRUE HISTORICAL EVENTS. *Do access also email exchanges between Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, and an insider with 25 years experience in the USA]

The letter below, spells things out, especially the fact that the Prime Minister, acted in accordance with the evidence submitted to him by the creator of these pages and web-site. We need only add that it was not a case of simply the media barons, and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by them, who elected to ignore the developments and suppress the realities. All alleged victim challengers who contacted us treated the developments as non-events just like the media. [*Link from here to the page where we released email exchanges with an alleged victim-challenger but recognised convert-to & lover-user of the facilities in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers and corruption of conditioned morons though abuse of the courts facilities, working in tandem with the legal circles and NOTE THE CHALLENGES to the craft-y one, an alleged Freemason basher]

Copy of the letter on the right was submitted to the editors of:- 

The Times The Guardian The Daily Telegraph
The Independent The Daily Mail The Daily Express
The Daily Mirror The Sun The London Evening Standard
Copies of the letter were also delivered to the House of Commons for reference to by and the attention of the Home Affairs Spokes Persons / Shadow Cabinets of the Conservatives & the Liberal-Democrats.

Many the copies of submissions, such as the letter to the Home Secretary the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard in 1993, the letter to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw in December 1998 when Home Secretary, the letters to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field in 1997,  the letter to the DSS Fraud Department in May 1998, the submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and to the Home Secretary in February / March 2002, the explicit letter to the Rt. Hon Frank Field MP in April 2003 and countless others. 

We need to add that all persons who contacted us over the years received copies of the letters & or were pointed to the pages where we published copies of the letters. Copies of the letters and additional material which we posted to the DSS Fraud Department were also submitted to the publicist Max Clifford, whose services secured the interest of the media in the matter of the multiple litter a human was to give birth to after interference with / manipulation of nature by the medical professions. Also of great interest too, the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, determined that Mr & Mrs Average should regale at the fact that a 14 year old schoolgirl was impregnated by a 12 years old boy and the girls parents declared that they would be all too happy to raise their grandchild while their daughter was to carry on with her education, the education system that taught her how as an animal she could reproduce the species, the species with no moral values, ethics or citizenship responsibilities, as organised by the abductors of Democracy and Justice.

Letter to the Prime Minister in December 1999
d99ltpmr.jpg (140631 bytes)
Chris Jones of C4 was but one of many within the media who received copy of the above letter and many the exchanges in the course of telephone calls.

RESPONSE ; NONE. Of  no interest and no concern whatsoever in ORGANISED CRIME 

We hasten to point out that the media Barons / Editors and the Intellectual Prostitutes they control and manipulate COULD NOT CARE LESS ABOUT THE STATE OF ARROGANT & BLUNT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. In the meantime busy informing us where a married man used to go for something he was not able to benefit from, at home.

WITH THE ABOVE REALITIES in mind, can anyone ignore the contributions of all ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS TOWARDS THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS? Can anyone ignore the RECKLESS DEFAULTS & OMISSIONS by persons we name and expose as converts-to and lovers of the system of operations? We refer all, yet again, to the realities we pointed one and all umpteen times, as covered in the page /confraud.htm & WE POINT ALL to the House of Lords Precedent case, some details of which we released in March 2008 in the page /4suckers.htm

COMBATING DISINFORMATION & DEFAULTS BY THE MEDIA
VICTIMS COULD / SHOULD ACT as the law provides
[*Link]:

* So, you have complained and gone to the media. You have been ignored or the local press published a half baked potato thus appearing concerned about the serious issues you reported. We keep in mind the complete lack of interest, by the media barons and their stooges, in the matter of the rampant fraud and corruption from within Local Government and Authorities as endorsed, aided and abetted crimes by the police and the local courts. We cover such realities and facts in our pages, as wide awake and as law abiding citizens. We act so because we respect the rights of the tax payers, who should get to know of the truth; how alleged public(!) servants(?) indulge and freely serve other agendas, thereby generating and instigating rampant criminal activities, at the public's expense. [*Link from here to a challenge to the Crown Prosecution Service covering in a nutshell ALL THAT ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS ENGAGE IN, AS CREATORS OF THE SOCIETY OF THE TEACHINGS MOST FOLLOW, FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER PRESENTED TO THE SONS OF MEN). 
* You believe, in fact you know, that you are not the only victim of malpractice and or downright fraud by public servants who abused/abuse public office and misled you. They mislead 'their masters, the citizens' and simply TREAT THEM AS SERFS of the Middle Ages.
* You buy a daily paper and you know that much is to be desired because of the lack of frank and honest information, making mockery of all assertions about democracy by the hypocrites who serve you with such crap.
* Simply do not buy a newspaper for a day or two. Instead use the coppers / pennies / cents / Euros it would cost you to buy the paper and make copies of a statement of the issues and facts (which you can prove) that you complained about and reported to the sold souls who are operating under the guise of 'free press / media' in our pseudo-democracies.
* With the cheap cost of local copy-services you end up with at least half a dozen of copies of an A4 sheet where you are stating the facts and realities. Include your name and telephone / contact address.
* Attend the offices/place where the offensive activities and or the newspaper / courts buildings that ignored the matters you are raising in your statement of facts - copies.
* HAND COPIES to persons who acknowledge to you similar experiences. AND ask the recipients to also not buy a newspaper for a day or two and make more copies which they should then pass on to other concerned citizens from within your neighbourhood. At the same time they act similarly in stating their own experiences.
* It should only take a few hours of each person's time to act as we invite you, but when a number of recipients do act as we suggest the number will multiply and within your area you should be able to get a group together ready, willing and able to take additional initiatives that the offending public servants / yes-men lap-dogs will be having to deal with as public servants and not as sold souls
* WHEN YOU HAVE enough supporters / persons sharing your concerns and anxieties about mankind you could set up your own web-site. There you can publish the vile activities and the facts that establish and prove criminal activities that are ignored and endorsed by those who allegedly are retained to serve the citizens and the law. Once published, spread the news through your email contacts and in news-group postings, ALL CAN THEN ACCESS THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE and you can point them to the applicable law that was / is breached by alleged public(!) servants*(?) that we point to on our pages.

Just consider the words of John Swainton, who served as Chief of Staff with the 'New York Times' in the 1860's / 1870's. The quote, from his retirement speech to his staff is from an article by Dana Baker on "Media Suppression" in Profile Magazine:
    "There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There's not one of you who would dare to write his honest opinion. The business of a journalist is to destroy truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell himself, his country and his race for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents, our possibilities and our lives are the property of these men. we are intellectual prostitutes". [*Link from here to the root of it all and read of the plans for 'the serfs', for the sons of men on planet earth

PFfootorbr.jpg (10660 bytes)

SUNDAY EXPRESS April 1993

OPINION page 21
IT'S YOU WHO
LOSE OUT WHEN
JOURNALISTS
ARE GAGGED

By Paul Foot

`The freedom that means
standing up to the bully'.

[Access the plans behind it all]

pfoota1.jpg (17614 bytes)

IN OPINION polls about the professions, we journalists always do very badly. We fight it out with estate agents for the wooden spoon.

I think, on the whole, we deserve our lowly position, though why doctors and accountants always do so well I've never understood.

Perhaps it's because doctors and accountants have a close personal relationship with their clients, while journalists usually stumble into people's lives at time of stress or disaster.

Last week I felt forced to walk out of a journalist's job which put me in rare contact with my readers.

For the last 13 1/2 years I have written a page in the Daily Mirror. My sources and inspiration were the Mirror readers.

A ceaseless flow of letters and calls came to me from people I'd never met, people who read and enjoyed the Daily Mirror but felt it was more than just a good read. They felt, rightly, that the Mirror had a reputation for springing to the support of its readers when they were in trouble.

I felt like a court of last resort. The people who wrote to me had, usually, already been to see their solicitor or their MP.

They knew I was not qualified to help them. They knew that my only power was to write, and to keep writing on their behalf. And they reckoned, rightly, that the power was often enough to correct a wrong which had run out of remedies in the courts or in Parliament or anywhere else.

A lot of these letters came from prisons, from people who said they'd been wrongly convicted. When I started writing my column - in 1979 - it seemed to most people impossible that anyone could be wrongfully convicted of a serious crime. As I looked into the cases, I was shocked at how many wrong convictions they proved. I raised case after case, often without success.

When Kevin Sarbutts came into my office to tell me he had lied when he told a court he had seen Aban Turner stab a man to death at the Notting Hill Carnival, I believed him at once, and wrote about it; then wrote about it again.

Before long Aban Turner who'd been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on Sarbutts's false evidence, walked free.

The Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, the Swansea Two, the Cardiff Three were all released after strong journalists' campaigns.

Campaigns like this get high praise when they are successful. While they are going on, they are always unpopular.

WHEN a hospital worker wrote to me in 1983 complaining about a sleeping pill called Halcion, I wrote again and again about its dangerous side effects. Drug companies and doctors united against me, warning me to clear off their patch. Then suddenly last year, eight years after my campaign, Halcion was banned. To campaign like this we need the backing of our editors, and our own space to forge a trust with our readers. For 13 years at the Mirror I was lucky to have both.

I noticed as the years went on that the letters and calls changed in tone. The formalities with which people normally contact newspapers vanished.

"Dear Mr Foot" became "Dear Paul." It was as though people were reading what I wrote, growing used to it, and feeling free to share their lives and their problems with me.

It is crucial that journalists should have the space and the freedom to campaign for their readers as I was able to do.

If the freedom of the Press means anything, it must mean the freedom to write against the stream, to challenge orthodoxies and power complexes, to use the strength of big newspaper combines to stand up for the underdog against the bully.

But what if the newspaper itself is run by bullies? What if the atmosphere inside a newspaper office reflects the problems which the campaigning journalist is trying to solve?

I've been grappling with that contradiction since 1984 when Robed Maxwell bought the Daily Mirror. He was a bully to beat all bullies. He hated opposition from anyone, and certainly didn't tolerate any from his own employees.

Campaigning and exposition in a Maxwell paper wasn't easy. Again and again people

would say: "How can you complain about this boss when Maxwell is worse?

I gritted my teeth and stuck to my column, knowing that my editors protected me against Maxwell and that, all Mirror journalists were members of a trade union with which Maxwell signed and honoured agreements.

Since last October, since our new management took over at the Daily Mirror and sacked the editor, these protections have vanished. The editor and the management act together.

The journalists' union has been systematically smashed.

Many of the letters I've had in the last six months have complained about "macho management" - indiscriminate sackings and victimisations.

I wrote about these in my column, but increasingly it seemed absurd to expose macho management elsewhere without mentioning what was going on in the building I worked in.

I decided to write about that as well. I wrote a whole column about the Mirror management. For the first time in 13 1/2 years the column was not printed.

When I printed it myself and handed it out to the public, the editor sent faxes to all other editors suggesting I was off my rocker.

Our unjust and divided society desperately needs campaigning journalists.

If we are, as some suggest, a dying breed, then a hunk of free speech and democracy is dying with us.

But campaigning journalists cannot survive if the newspapers which employ them are run by petty dictatorships of the type those newspapers should set out to expose.

/ends

© Express Newspapers Ltd.

We can only point out that while journalists ARE GAGGED by their controllers / employers ALL OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM - CHALLENGERS WE ARE EXPOSING as lover-converts to the system of operations and the facilities in place for RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS (through abuse of the courts facilities) EACH & EVERYONE HAD THE LUXURY OF FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Their failures to state the facts, REPORT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN that which the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes suppress, places them in the unenviable position of MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS, & USERS / PROMOTERS OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR THE CORRUPTION OF MORONS OF THEIR MENTALITY & ATTITUDE TO LAW. [*Link to the facility in place]

In the Daily Mail, an all important article relevant to FAMILY in March 2000

As Jack Straw praises traditional Asian family values.....

We British Asians look with sorrow
at the spread of divorce, children born outside marriage
and what might be taught about homosexuality.
I wish the party I love would do more
to support the family.

by Lord Paul
Leading Labour Peer

   JACK STRAW'S wise words about the strength and resilience of the traditional Asian family will be welcomed by the millions of British subjects whose origins lie in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
   It is one more sign that this Government genuinely believes that we are a legitimate part of this country and our values and attitudes are an asset, not a source of embarrassment.
   Those of us who are ourselves immigrants - I am one, I came here in 1966 - know how right the Home Secretary is to emphasise the importance of marriage to the stability and progress of the Asian community.
   We desperately needed the backing of our wives and children in those early days. Quite simply, we would not have survived and prospered without the support provided by marriage - proper, traditional marriage.
   And, without the discipline imposed on us by the knowledge that we had a continuing legal and religious obligation (as well as an obligation founded on love) to support our wives and children, we would certainly not have found the strength and the stability needed to build up mighty businesses and to plan for our domestic futures in our new homeland.
   We would not have settled as well as we have, we would not have contributed as much and, I suspect, we would not have been as readily accepted.

Unique

   That is why I am convinced that the Government must do much more to recognise and support the institution of marriage and pay less attention to those trendy liberals who argue that all 'relationships' are much of a mushiness.
   They are not. Marriage is a unique public declaration of commitment and I hope that the Government I support will do more to emphasise that uniqueness.
   In my case, I came to this country in 1966 to be with my beloved daughter, Ambika, who was being treated for leukaemia here. When she died, my wife and I were so heartbroken that we determined to stay on to be near her. That is why I founded my business here instead of going back home to join the family firm.
   Thirty years later I was in a position to hand over what had become a commercial giant to the day-to-day control of my three sons Ambar, Akash and Angad. But they insisted that I stay on as chairman and they give me due deference.
   I know they do not always think I am right, but they accept that I am a source of experience and wisdom and have been around for a long time. Above all, they know that I try to think like the head of an extended family with responsibilities which extend down the generations.
   I am proud, not embarrassed, to say that mine is a family business which I hope will, in time, be handed on to my grandchildren. I believe that extended families can run and build businesses with long-term views and a clear sense of responsibility.
   In the societies from which we came, it was generally accepted that marriage (not liaisons, continuing or casual) was the foundation stone on which our communities, our nations and our prosperity were built. Marriage was, quite simply, the bedrock of society.
   If marriage and the family came under strain then so did society.
   I am convinced that to be successful in business you need to be happy in your marriage.

Despair

   That is why I, like many Asians, look with sorrow at the steady erosion of marriage in this, our adopted country and we hope that the Government will do more to reverse the trend.
   We despair at the spread of divorce and the number of children born outside marriage. We are not happy with casual promiscuity and we worry what our children might be taught about homosexuality.
   We are particularly concerned that some Asian youngsters are accepting the casual, anything-goes approach to sex, which they see all around them. Of course I accept the point that the Home Secretary made yesterday: 'Single parent families and parents who have chosen to live together without marrying can in the right circumstances do well for their children.' Who ever thought otherwise?
   Mr Straw himself stressed the fundamental point that marriage had 'a better chance of offering children a stable environment in which to grow up'.
   We Asians are brought up knowing that. Our instinctive feeling for marriage is strengthened by academic research, which shows that children desperately need stability and continuity - and that these values are most likely to be found in God-fearing families built around proper marriages.

Sincere

For almost five years now I have sat in the House of Lords, where I am proud to take the Labour Whip and to support an administration, which I believe is doing much good.
   I have had the opportunity to talk with Tony Blair and most of the leading figures in his cabinet. I am convinced that their belief in the importance of marriage and of family values is sincere.
   But I wish and hope that this support becomes more visible.
   Take the whole, unnecessary row over the repeal of Section 28.
   When the issue came before the Lords some weeks ago I decided to abstain. Last night, after listening to the discussion and the compromise the Government has made, and realising that there are a number of people who believe less in the institution of marriage than I do, I voted with the Government.
   The other big consideration for me was that the Lords should not defy the will of the Commons. But I remain convinced that its phraseology blurs the distinction between marriage and cohabitation.
   As for the abolition of the Married Couples Allowance in our tax and benefit system, it has given a negative message and I wish it could be reversed.
   Why does marriage not bring with it fiscal rewards - as it does in France and Germany?
   It is easy to utter kind and no doubt sincere - words about the worthiness of marriage and family values.
   But I wish the Government I support would do more to support the family.

© Daily Mail - UK Friday, March 24, 2000

Most interesting article by Francis Beckett, in August 2003. Nothing but promotions of that which the abductors and rapists of Justice & Democracy have been busy creating for centuries. Visitors, readers will be invited to access material and pages when released for general access.*Link from here to a report from an awakened victim of the system of operations, released in May 2009.

Waffle from the Daily Express about the performance of boys at school 

  • Simply consider the words:-
    "Children do well if they can see some hope".
  • We did invite the author and the editor of the Daily Express to contact us.
  • We wished and still aim to point them both to the elements that they appear to be oblivious to.
  • As well tutored or manipulated marionettes, they are not likely to consider our views. 
  • We do not expect any responses from the mentally blind, deaf and dumb; they simply serve their masters as faithful lap-dogs.78

We do look to more victims, who know of the realities, to join the growing numbers of the pro-active who use their rights, assured in law, and we expect of them to state/report in the public domain the facts of life in all allegedly civilised states. [*Link from here to an assured (?) right].

de18augr.jpg (162623 bytes)

Visitors, readers and researchers are requested to access the article we reproduce below, in HTML for links to & from. All can learn a thing or two from hypocrites & Intellectual Prostitutes who are serving the plans of the evil ones, for the 'SONS OF MEN', as clarified in very explicit material we publish in our pages (*F1).

Daily Express Monday 18 August, 2003

By FRANCIS BECKETT

Why Boys Are Second Best In The Classroom

   NEXT week's GCSE results will confirm what we already know. Our daughters are performing better in the classroom than our sons, the gap gets wider every year and the worst performing boys come from the poorest homes. We know it is partly because there is a culture among teenage boys that looks down on doing well in lessons - but that has always been there.
   When I was at school the "swot" always top in everything, always with his hand waving frantically in the air when a teacher asked a question, was a despised figure. Heaven help him if he met the first rugby XV in a dark alley.
   So, why is the gap getting bigger? Schools minister David Miliband thinks it is because boys' schools need a greater culture of achievement and firmer discipline and no doubt he is right, as far as it goes.
   He is on shakier ground when he suggests that more course work and fewer examinations favour girls. He says this "feminises" the (GCSE and A-level systems but there is nothing particularly "feminine" about course work or "masculine" about examinations.
   And there is no reason to believe that if you abandoned course work and relied solely on examinations, boys would start to narrow the gap. You have to look deeper than that to understand why our education system is letting down boys and why boys from the poorest families are let down worst.
   First, there are far fewer male teachers than there used to be. Children are likely to be taught mostly by women. In fact, there are many primary schools attended by both sexes, which have only women teaching. So boys subconsciously start to think that schoolwork is something that girls do.
   Men are deserting the teaching profession, partly because it pays badly. Despite the recent increase, teachers are still not paid enough to keep their families in comfort, especially those who work in cities. The earnings of the wife who teaches are still often seen as the "second income" - husbands get a proper job and keep the family and wives teach to pay for extras.
   And the growing culture of complaint and litigation means that all teachers, but especially men, have to be very careful how they behave towards children, lest they are misunderstood.
   Many male teachers now say that they never talk to a girl pupil alone, only with a woman teacher present as a witness. Teaching under those conditions is stressful and joyless.
   Second, there is the growing strength and dominance of the "lad culture". This is reinforced by the school of feminists that believes that the best way to get equal treatment for girls is to run down boys.
   There are still some women teachers who try to increase the self worth of the girls in their care by undermining that of the boys. Feminist writer Angela Phillips's latest book is called, ominously, "The Trouble With Boys".
   "There's a general sense," writes education lecturer Dr. Anne Gray "in which boys are seen to be missing out and that men are becoming redundant. Traditional forms of male employment are on the decline.
   "And the areas of employment are demanding skills that girls have always been good at - like good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance several tasks at once."
   Now, some girls have good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance tasks, and some do not. Some boys have them, and some do not. If we tell boys that these things are essentially female characteristics we have only ourselves to blame if they decide that their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant. But why is it that the poorer the family, the wider the gap? Working-class boys are falling behind all other pupils at an alarming rate.
   They are not doing as well as their brains and skills and talents suggest they should do," says Mr Miliband.
   This is a direct result of government policies. Poor children do not normally get to grammar schools, which select the most academically able pupils at the age of 11. In comprehensives, one in five of the children are poor enough to get free school meals. In grammar schools, it is about one in 37. So children from poor families tend to assume that they will go to the non-selective - and therefore the less academic - schools.
   And as the Government increases the number of schools which are allowed to select some or all of their pupils it will further reduce the expectations of the poor.
   CHILDREN do well if they can see some hope. If, when they look around them, they find that people from their part of town go to the less desirable schools, as the poor find, then hope is undermined.
   If, when they listen to their elders, they learn that their sex is inherently stupider than the opposite sex, their hope is undermined even further. It is no wonder that working-class boys see little point in studying.
 

`We've only ourselves to blame if boys decide their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant'

© Express Newspapers - 18th August 2003

May 2003, below clearly stated and pointed to HISTORICAL FACTS & REALITIES. Typical of editors, the London Evening Standard's, ignored it all. [*Access the words of an insider in this page for the reasons why]

Below, in HTML for links to and from, the text of the FAX-letter - submissions and invitation to the editor of the London Evening Standard. As a typical 'puppet & sold to the devil soul' Ms Veronica Wadley could not be bothered with the truths she was pointed to. Cooking the books - like tax avoidance accountants - is part of her retainer. She simply acted / behaved exactly as John Swainton spoke of when he was moving out of the firing line (*Link). Positive discrimination IS part of the service on offer to the puppeteers and pay-cheque barons, in pseudo-democracies.

Contact:  webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk
Creator of the human-rights.org Community On Line
To Join,  go to:   Contact us for reasons to problems
http://www.members.human-rights.org

Non Governmental Organisation
Creators of the human-rights.org
www based Community On Line
FAX: (0044)+0870-0514-301

http://www.uk-human-rights.org

To: Editor V. Wadley – London Evening Standard Fax: 020 - 7937 - 2648
From: Andrew Yiannides – Human-Rights Org. London Date: Printed 16/03/05 Created: 10 May 2003
Re: Organised Promotions For Undisclosed Aims Pages: THREE – with this page
CC: CoL Re: Indoctrination / Suppression of truths Reference: 10MLESHP
¨ URGENT ¨ FOR REVIEW ¨ PLEASE  ACT ¨ Please COMMENT ¨ Please REPLY ¨ Please RECYCLE

MESSAGE

Dear Ms Wadley

Interesting the article by David Cohen and the issue of concerns and fears by ordinary folk up and down the country.

Through the article Mr Cohen, rightly set out to use the usual promotions that rest and are founded on ‘the holocaust as sold to the uninformed’, by way of ‘a warning to the citizens, of ‘the consequences’ to the path they are taking. In the meantime politicians and the media, collectively, impose on the citizens undeclared plans for them.

Can you please inform your readers, as to or if ever the LES addressed the issue of the original holocaust? I refer to the ethnic/religious cleansing, by the Turks, of the Armenian Christians and the Greek Christians. Historical facts and realities cannot be suppressed, by design, merely because it suits the plans of individuals and or of any group of organised ‘abusers of media facilities’ in our times. In reference to the original holocaust (from the Greek word ‘olocaftoma’, meaning to burn the lot) Hitler was reported and recorded to have retorted: "Who remembers/speaks of the Armenians?"

What of the following recorded facts and realities? The papal legate in Croatia, Mgr. Marcone, openly blessing the Ustasha and publicly giving the fascist salute! His Eminence Archbishop Stepinac, head of the Catholic Hierarchy in Croatia informing the Holy Father that 240,000 Orthodox Serbs had been converted to the Church of God"! (Christians converted by force to the church that was created by another God(?) or presumably God Himself personally because His Son and the followers of His Son, had made a mess of things). What of the fact that the present Holy Father in 1998 made Archbishop Stepinac of Croatia, where 700,000 Orthodox Serbians were gassed along with 250,000 plus Jews and Romany, A SAINT.

I am sure that you, personally, and the LES, will publish this letter because of the historical facts that I point you to. If anything you, and the LES, must be seen to be unbiased and informative; after all that is the real purpose of any newspaper in any ‘true democratic’ state.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS

[*Link from here to image of the transmitted FAX, in left panel] [*Link from here to the root of it all as planned by impostors

The convenient defaults by the editor to apply herself to the issues she was pointed,  fade into insignificance when one considers the ever-present promotions and the only logical conclusion one can derive from the reference to the church presumably created by God himself. [In late 2006 we were informed that Turkey's relationship with the USA is likely to be adversely affected, should the USA go on record as recognising 'the cleansing of Armenian Christians of Asia Minor' >>> And in 2008 the European Union is caused by the French to consider the suppressed realities and historical events we pointed to the editor of the London Evening Standard].

The Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair was reported, on 29th September 1998, to have stated that he could / can save the family.... Years on and no signs of calling the legal circles to book, despite an alleged investigation by the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan police. He had been instructed, in July of the same, year to investigate the untouchables..... corrupt judges, solicitors, police officers... [*Link from here to the press release in July 1998. *Readers & researchers should Link to a brief statement, that never was intended for the taxpayers, in respect of  the Hudson family case; all should consider accessing other material we point to from there].

  • In March 2000 the same newspaper presented its readers with the views and concerns of Lord Paul. [*Link from here to the article, above]
  • Most clearly stated his Lordship's views on family matters. No decent human could ever overlook or ignore the fundamental principles and the reasons why citizens engage in the creation of families, especially the purpose for such social units in 'civilised societies' that evolved of similar foundations from primitive societies. [*Link from here to awakenings in persons who recognised the fact that women / Eves were/are being used by the creators of pseudo-civilised societies in accordance with the New World Order Code of Morals & Ethics]
  • Readers, researchers and victims of the divorce industry should acquaint themselves with the facts and the realities in the case we publish, and expose HOW three generations ended up in litigation and wars within the courts after a caring daughter retained solicitors to... [*Link from here to the page and prepare for more revelations and evidence attached to the parts and the activities of the fraudsters-club-recruit] 
dmtbpsfr.jpg (136161 bytes)

<>

<>

IMPRESSIVE REVELATIONS & THE VICTIMS ACCOSTED & COERCED TO JOIN THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB WE POINT TO IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE WHERE WE EXPOSE THE MODUS OPERANDI SIMPLY MULTIPLY. [*Link from here to the exclusive page]

One of the rare media gems, a half baked potato the public was offered while hundreds, if not thousands of cases up and down the country were being reported to the press and to the media, by the victims. The victims invariably men and, on the agenda, the plans of the LIPS crowd / mob to proceed as Andrew was invited to take part in BUT TURNED DOWN, on many instances. Among  them the only sincere (?) person Mr G. H Scriven. He was forced into a compromising situation and had no option but to go along the path that others were treading. He had, after all, accepted to act as President of the LIPS crowd mob. One of the others was the 'victim' Johan M. R. Foenander, who was introduced to us after he had already negotiated a settlement to be met by the tax payers under the table, as a letter from solicitors who were representing him at the time of the introduction, establishes. A few others, introduced to human-rights, by the LIPS crowd / mob acting also as endorsers of the double fraud without flinching an eye lid. Many looking forward to being party to more of the same, as alleged legal gurus helping others down the only path they had endorsed. [*Link from here to the letter]

The Mail on Sunday
divlawfm.jpg (85442 bytes)
x
The headline declaration for the article the 'Mail on Sunday' disseminated in 1999 suffices. We shall release evidence establishing beyond and doubt the element of ORGANISED ASSAULT ON FAMILIES in the United Kingdom, one of the many pseudodemocracies and specifically targeted Christian states, all care of plans that have been on the drawing boards of the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth   ('mother gaia') centuries millennia ago.
More acknowledgements and developments in the pipeline, 10 years AFTER the propositions from one who recognised and knew of it all. The realities one reads of below, submitted to many a 'fraudster club recruit' and recognised lovers, of the system of operations : * of the rampant FRAUD THROUGH the courts leading to the corruption of morons of their amoral fibre* [*L].

An enquiry of the proponents: "It is a well known factor that the controllers / owners of THE INFORMATION MEDIA are suppressing the truth and the realities, from the citizens because of the personal interests and the aims / plans of the controllers of the media and others with whom they have set agendas and goals for the planet"*. [*L]
And the Response: "Yes I know!!! It is deplorable! The Internet is changing this!!! They can't stop us now!!. I am being optimistic. You must be aware of this.... many interesting articles and such".
ELSEWHERE on the very issues: "Since this is a virtual business and there will be servers ALL OVER THE WORLD, I think it will be hard to be 'fully corrupted' .... you will be sure to find many like minded people to work with you..... just for the record, I have spent 25 years working in the US.... talk about corruption!!! I will not even begin to tell you how excited I am to be part of building the....".

IMPORTANT NOTE:- The email exchanges were forwarded to a number of recognised hypocrites who simply ignored such developments. They just carried on 'serving their personal interests and their undeclared partnerships / co-operation with the creators of the New World Order Code of Ethics & Morals, as adopters of it.*Link [*L] to more facts

Page1
usaexp1r.jpg (249218 bytes)
The exchanges will be released in due course. Priority is to challenge / expose the maintenance engineers and front line soldiers, the lovers of the system we name and expose. They have been serving the system as committed front line soldiers fraudsters club recruits.  

Page2
usaexp2r.jpg (248748 bytes)
Date submitted to many an allegedly concerned challenger, 10th May 2003. Mr. P Talbot Jenkins exhibited the usual contempt which persons who serve other agendas engage in. [*Link from here to email exchanges with him & work things out or seek further information]  

The above with our compliments to the managers and controllers of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS) and their gurus. ALL OF WHOM promoting plenty of fraudulent misrepresentations, taking part in theatrical productions intended to impress the victims they are pointed to & SUCK INTO THEIR WORLD OF FRAUD APLENTY. The corruption of 'the serfs' they use for the intended REWARDS under the table as created and imposed by the organisers and managers of it all. 

In March 2007 the National Audit Office reported :
LAWYERS ARE  STEERING DIVORCING COUPLES.....
We recommend researchers and victims to first read the newspaper article, which we reproduced from the Daily Mail of 2nd March 2007, in its entirety. Anyone genuinely concerned about the practices, referred and pointed to by the Commons Public Accounts Committee, should then re-read the article and access each link-to page / material from each point where the links are placed. The reader shall then benefit from a BETTER GRASP  OF THE PRACTICES and the arrogant FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, AS USED BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES WITH ARROGANT FRAUDULENT INTENT.

[*Link from here to a page where we cover some of the practices in the courts and the divorce industry; recognise the evil forces at work. *Do read the appeal published [*L] in the page and recognise why a fraudsters' club recruit shoved the appeal in the closet of the family he had joined BEFORE he came along to promote all manner of alleged concerns, as a typical lover of it all, which love his activities and his conscious parts in the constructive frauds established beyond any doubt. Recognise how organised the fraud through the courts has been and who are responsible for sustaining it through misrepresentations and false assertions. Only after using the links pointed to from the parts where links are incorporated (for additional material to access) informed opinions and views can be formulated]

Divorce lawyers 'steer couples to court for profit'
By Matthew Hickley - Home Affairs Correspondent

   LAWYERS are cynically steering divorcing couples away from cheap mediation sessions and into costly court battles to boost their fees, an official report claims.[*Link from here to an extract from a researcher's published work]
   With four out of five divorces ending up before a judge, millions of pounds of taxpayers money is being squandered on legal aid, according to the National Audit Office.
[No mention by the author of the article about the fact that Legal Aid is just A LICENSE TO CHARGE & CONVERT TARGETED ASSETS, as below covered, to legal costs through the stated facts & activities [*L] covered by the article]
   Many cases could have been settled far quicker and with less animosity if lawyers had not kept their clients in the dark about the mediation option, it is said.
   The spending watchdog calls for an urgent investigation into solicitors who fail to keep enough cases out of the courtroom, and says they should be stripped of legal aid contracts unless they have a convincing excuse.
[*Link from here to CHALLENGES when solicitors & COURT ABANDONED their fraudulent court orders]

07divarf.jpg (205274 bytes)
   Critics last night accused 'fatcat lawyers' of exploiting emotionally stressed divorce clients to turn a fast buck and pointed out they are under a legal obligation to suggest mediation.
   The Chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, Edward Leigh, urged a crackdown on lawyers who are 'happy to jump straight into court room, leaving the taxpayer to pick up the bill".
   Leading solicitors acknowledge that sharp practices existed, but claimed only a small minority of lawyers were at fault and insisted mediation would be futile in many of the 150,000 divorces in England and Wales each year.
   Last year divorce cases swallowed some £328million of the legal aid budget, up from £320million the previous year.
   Whenever legal aid is involved solicitors are obliged to offer clients the option of mediation. But the NAO report found a third of such divorces had never heard of mediation.
   Of those, almost half said they would have given the process a go had they known. Their cases alone would have saved the taxpayer £10million.
   The sessions offer divorcing couples a chance to sit down with a trained mediator to hammer out a financial deal and agreement on child custody. Some 60 per cent of attempts are successful.
   The couple still each receive legal advise from a solicitor but, without court hearings, the process is far quicker and cheaper - taking an average three-and-a-half months to settle and costing £752 in legal aid, compared with 14 months and £1,682 for court cases.
   And although mediation is often still stressful, research since the 1980s, when it first became widespread, shows agreements are less acrimonious and work better in the long term, particularly for children. In parts of the U.S. mediation is compulsory for all divorces, while in Sweden 90 per cent of cases are resolved outside courts.
   The NAO report says far more British divorce cases should be settled this way.
   Excluding divorces involving violence or abuse, where mediation is usually impossible, the watchdog found that out of 150,000 legal aid cases over an 18 month period only 30,000 - one in five - attempted mediation, while the majority went straight to court.
[*Link to Footnote]
   The report highlighted the 'financial disincentive to solicitors of advising people about mediation', adding : 'If a case is settled out of court, this will result in a loss of potential fees for them.'
   The report follows years of accusations that lawyers deliberately spin-out divorce cases and fuel disagreements to maximise their fees.
   One case involving a Derby businessman and his wife - dubbed the War of the Roses after a Hollywood movie - finally settled in the High Court in 2004 after swallowing up £570,000 in legal bills, more than half the couple's assets. A judge described the fees as 'shockingly disproportionate'.
   Martin Mears, former president of the Law Society and now a practising solicitor, said: 'Of course there's a minority of old fashioned solicitors who make their money from fomenting disagreements.
   'Everyone knows there are some, but I think it's a very small number. It's hard to identify such cases.'
   Resolution, formerly the Solicitors Family Law Association, rejected the NAO's accusations, claiming its 5,000 members did everything they could to encourage mediation and other 'alternative ways of resolving disputes' whenever possible.
   m.hickley@dailymail.co.uk

2nd March 2007

© Associated Newspapers Limited - London UK

 

...

Below a simple statement in respect of the Hudson family divorce. The case WAS TO HAVE BEEN REPORTED & COVERED BY US after Mr Andrew Yiannides met with 'the victim', Mr Brian Hudson, at the Extraordinary Meeting arranged by the LIPS crowd / mob in October 1999. Interestingly the meeting was not attended by Mr Norman Scarth & Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, both of whom knew they were to be acting as Secretary and President of the crowd / mob, as the organisers of the crowd had arranged at an earlier meeting in Leeds.

Facts & Realisations
hudsonr.jpg (101059 bytes)
Most definitely NOT for Mr & Mrs Average, NOT for the serfs to know of. Just impressive private thoughts. Why NOT in the public domain?

  • On the left the suppressed realities in the Hudson family case.
  • The brief statement simply intended for presentation to targeted 'victim-suckers and serfs' primed / conditioned for conversion to and adoption of the system as is, as covered in the page where we state the harsh realities and deal with the activities of another 'victim of the divorce industry'. [*Link from here to the page where we raise the issue of CORRUPTING CONDITIONED VICTIMS OF THE COURTS & LEGAL CIRCLES care of the facility in place for depletion of the national budget through the abused courts service & CONTEMPT FOR the LAW].
  • We refer to a converted lover and front line maintenance engineer of the system of operations who was sent along to abuse our readiness to work with victims & to test our grasp of the criminal activities ongoing in and through abuse of the courts.
  • On the right a letter from 'The Campaign for A Fair Hearing', to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir. Paul Condon. As usual such matters are not for Mr & Mrs Average to know of. Such realities are simply suppressed as the Intellectual Prostitutes and their editors arrange in conformity with pre-existing plans for the serfs of planet earth. [*Link from here to the page where we published the long existing plans of the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth, 'mother gaia'].

And a letter to the police
sfm2mphr.jpg (257569 bytes)
Some letter indeed. One of the many 'private love letters', to the reckless, to the indifferent and to the creators of the New World Order of Ethics & Morals.

The reader / researcher should note that Mr Hudson submitted his own Brief Statement of Facts by FAX to Mr Andrew Yiannides for the intended RELEASE OF THE FACTS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, the Internet. As with other converts to & lovers of the system, all simply wishing to put pressure to bear on the abusers of the courts facilities, for a number of reasons that should be obvious to Mr & Mrs Average, he changed his mind within two days. Need anyone to ask what transpired in the meantime? We need only add that Mr Bryan Hudson was one of a number, represented by Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander for the SPECIAL MISSION OF THE LATTER TO AUSTRALIA, in the Spring of 2000.

FOOTNOTE:
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.   The obvious covered in the exclusive page where we specifically point to the abused facilities for rampant constructive frauds on the taxpayers, is the most essential of realities commanding attention. Other concerned citizens and awakened researchers are publishing in the public domain, on the Internet, in group supported web-sites and personal web-pages their own conclusions. The material we reproduce and publish, with additional input from the founder of human-rights (NGO), Mr Andrew Yiannides, should go some way in awakening 'the spirit of man' in all true humans, thinkers, concerned citizens - taxpayers. We expect and anticipate of such persons to snap out of the indoctrinated states that have been imposed on them by the agents and partners of the organisers of such crimes against humanity. [*Link to a convert-lover and pro-actively engaged user of the rampant fraud on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts processes and facilities]. The two links in the preceding statement point to TWO DIFFERENT PERSONS, both of whom started as victims of the evil activities through abuse of the courts facilities AND BOTH CONVERTED TO LOVERS OF THE ACTIVITIES covered in the official statement by the Chairman of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (above). The states and impositions subsist ONLY BECAUSE OF THE ACTIVITIES & MENTALITY OF SUCH FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS who go about wilfully imposing their perverted / corrupted vies on the issue of use of the courts facilities, from within all pseudo-democracies, which the founder of human-rights (GO) recognised over 50 years ago, while a student at the English School in Nicosia Cyprus. We respectfully request of our visitors to access the following pages: /protocol.htm /humraped.htm /intropro.htm and to consider, as a starting point the lessons by examples stated in the page where we expose one of the most evil lovers of the system of 'dictatorship through the courts imposed in all pseudo-democracies'. The link above (*LX) takes the reader to the explicit comparison of lessons learned by a young inquisitive boy while at junior school; one exposes the vile truth suppressed by alleged spiritual leaders of 'the sons of men' on planet earth. The clearly stated plans of the evil ones as delivered to Ptolemy of Egypt over 2300 years ago, are A MUST FOR ALL VICTIMS OF THE DICTATORSHIPS IMPOSED THROUGH JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS. Most, if not all, followers of the evil plans for 'the sons of men (humans) on planet earth are subjecting 'the sons of men to such states, with impunity'.
  
  2.   We urge readers to note the reference to Legal Aid assisted cases ONLY. In other words NOT all divorce cases were taken into account by the National Audit Office. In the circumstances, Mr & Mrs Average, 'the serfs & victims' should consider the reality that as far as the Public Accounts Committee and the media barons are concerned, SINCE Mr & Mrs Average allow others to string them along, the government, our representatives in the House of Commons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained & maintained by the media barons, DO NOT GIVE A DARN about the state of 'the family of man'. Others, however will be used to encourage the victims of the abusers of public office and other public facilitates / services in order to chase more public funds, as Mr Frank Schaeffer identified in the 1990s and points out in his work [Link to the specific extract from the work, in our quotes page]. Wake up 'serfs' - access the material in the quotes page and then return to the following *Link in order to access the material we point to; read it and learn of the evil forces that have been at work for over 2300 years, as Mr Andrew Yiannides recognised decades ago while looking into, searching for the truth of the matter, the roots of the problems IMPOSED on 'the serfs' by abusers of trust 'public office'.
   3.    xxx
   4.    
xxx

Link To: HomePage   .YOUR RIGHTS in Law (ECoHR) Judges Independent of the Law   Corrupt Britain 

Access www.urrights.ning.com from here & if a genuine victim challenger join the network created for the concerned, ONLY

Link To: Organised Fraud .The LAW  O.L.S.O    Lawyers .Fraud VITIATES Judgements 
Link To:  Suppressed Plans .Morals and Morality  The O.S.S .Misconduct in Public Office   You can help through TAP

Back to HomePage  Back to Top of Page KEY

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...