Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Exposing Violations WorldWide

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)  Page Revised: June 20, 2012.

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page


The much revered independence of the judiciary, free to ignore the Law and the evidence lodged at court.   Marvel at the capabilities of persons, from within the Lord Chancellor's department, who promote assumed rights by judicial chair occupants to breach CRIMINAL LAW with impunity.


Below a letter from the Lord Chancellor's department following serious complaints

lochan1r.jpg (35533 bytes)

Read the above letter and the citizen's response below, Note the warranted comments and the citizen's OBSERVATIONS. 

The above letter was sent to the victim of ALL in  "The Breeding Grounds - case"*.  Public servants (police and county court staff/officers*) decided the 'victim family of four' HAD NO RIGHTS in Law. The judiciary,  the police and every other public servant felt duty bound, as always, to uphold not the law, but the decisions of the lowest of the low (a young constable,  a District Judge etc.). The evidence against all we now cover in this web-site, exists. THE relevant pages speak of themselves.  Judge for yourself as to the quality of service from within the Lord Chancellor's office and the Department. Recognise why the conclusion "Nothing but  impositions through which the income generating practices for the circles from within which they arose to public office in JUDICIAL chairs to act as unwise Solomon's and injudiciously".  We afford you the chance to read the letter (above) received from the Department of Civil Operations AND POLICY (a policy that directs public servants to uphold the rights of all judicial persons to act as they please and to serve other 'vested' interests, not justice). The Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases expose very vividly their practices*, their vested interests.  The citizen responded to the author of the circular type letter, at the time.  Attempts were made recently to contact the author of the letter without success.  He might perhaps read these pages, consider that HE was called upon to deal with the issues attached to and arising out of  'The Breeding Grounds - case"* and probably he might now reconsider his 'contemptuous response' to the victims of all.  He might now JUSTIFY the ATTEMPTS to obstruct and to DENY JUSTICE to the victim because of the well established and relied upon practices, as in the Scriven... Lawrence.... Scriven.... Lawrence.... Scriven....  Lawrence.... and countless other cases.  The theatres.....  the theatres....... the theatres....   The well rehearsed and promoted through the centuries SCENARIOS through misuse of and MISCONDUCT in public office.*  

(Back to Lord Chancellor: routine responses

The victim-citizen's response and observations to the above letter:-

The obvious:- 

(a) "this" in the singular, 

(b) "countries" in the plural

(c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. It was clear the author of the above letter needed to go back to school to learn English; the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the victim - citizen. Odd that years later, a person sitting in a judicial capacity exhibited similar capabilities and knowledge of the queen's English, in the long drawn out Ebert 'bankruptcy through false instruments' saga.

Needless to say the author was patronising. Note: 'may I suggest'.... from an illiterate who probably got promoted for the brilliant way in which he treated a victim of corrupt practices in the courts the Lord Chancellor maintains with such brilliant assistants as the author of the above letter.

The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to  generate income for the circles from within which judges in the United Kingdom arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate. 

Fail not to note the reference to the existence of an alleged constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta, and even that was abolished on joining the EEC. The citizen eight years on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries(?) written constitution can be secured. 

FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available public services (the CAB in the instance covered in the letter) knows not that the service he was referring to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau. Perhaps in the author's mind all from within the Lord Chancellor's Department were as advanced in ENGLISH and LAW as in the 'ways to cover up corruption' as the author of the letter to the victim exhibited.   It is clear that the author himself SIGNED the letter; one can further deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department. Furthermore that other person was/is as illiterate in English as the author of the letter. The author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing. Besides the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom could provide for THE JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAW.

Link to:  The MEDIA   CAP Index of cases   Your Rights(ECoHR)    Their practices 

Link to:  The Lord Chancellor's Office   Breeding Grounds - case   Court staff/officers 

Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office    

Back to HomePage

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...